Dismissed¶24

Shyam Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jun 2025CWJC/6583/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No.6583 of 2024; Shyam Kumar Sah v. State of Bihar (Araria/Jogbani respondents incl. Santosh Yadav); Justice Satyavrat Verma; decided 17-06-2025; writ application dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner's grievance stated to be redressed by State's stand in counter-affidavit; liberty granted to file suit for further relief; no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Writ application dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a suit for seeking further relief. ¶24

Shyam Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6583 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shyam Kumar Sah S/o Chandranarayan Sah, Resident of village- Uttar, Maheshwari, Jogbani, Ward no. 15, P.S. Jogbani, District- Araria.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Araria.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, District- Araria.

¶10

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Farbishganj.

¶11

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Farbishganj, Araria.

¶12

Circle Officer, Farbishganj block, Araria.

¶13

The Officer In-charge, Jogbani Police Station Araria.

¶14

Santosh Yadav son of Bacchu Yadav @ Sadanand Yadav resident of villageTakiya Tola, Ward no. 18, P.S- Jogbani, District- Araria.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rohit Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-4 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶18

2 17-06-2025

¶19

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶20

AC to GP-4.

¶21

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner,

¶22

at the outset, submits that in view of the stand taken by the State in the counter-affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner as raised in the instant writ application stands redressed, however the petitioner be given liberty to file a suit for seeking further relief in the case and thereafter seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.

¶23

3. Permission is accorded.

¶24

4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.6583 of 2024(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/2

¶26

withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

¶27

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶28

SUMIT/-