The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear on the hearing dates despite counsel for respondents being present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6447 of 2015
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. R.K. Singh, GP-2 For the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
5 09-01-2025 No one is present on behalf of the petitioners on
previous date i.e. on 10.12.2024 as well as today. However, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 6 and 7 as well as learned counsel for the State are present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6447 of 2015(5) dt.09-01-2025 2/2
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
khushbu/-
U
Anil Yadav
Mangal Yadav
State Of Bihar
Uday Shankar Bhagat
Wapi Bhaghat
Sunil Dutta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
