Disposed¶23

Chitranjan Kumar Madhup v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Apr 2025CWJC/5885/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.5885 of 2025, decided 22-04-2025 by Dr. Anshuman, J. Chitranjan Kumar Madhup v. State of Bihar (Health Department) & ors. Writ of mandamus sought for appointment on compassionate ground; petition disposed of as premature since the committee's decision was pending the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer's opinion in the next meeting. Advocates: Hridayal Kumar for petitioner; Advocate General for the State.

What did the court decide?

After going through Annexure-P/4 Serial No.2, the Court held that no interference was needed at that juncture because the case was premature, and disposed of the writ petition as premature. ¶23

Chitranjan Kumar Madhup Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5885 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chitranjan Kumar Madhup Son of Rajdeo Sharma, Resident of VillageAjwan, Police Station - Naubatpur, District - Patna, State - Bihar, PIN Code801109.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna - 15.

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna - 15.

¶8

The Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna- 15.

¶9

The Director in Chief (Nursing), Health Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna- 15.

¶10

The District Magistrate, District- Patna.

¶11

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, District - Patna.

¶12

The In-charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center (PHC), Bikram, Patna.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hridayal Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Advocate General ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 22-04-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

¶18

Learned Counsel for the State.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the State has raised preliminary objection and submits that till date the committee

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.5885 of 2025(2) dt.22-04-2025 2/2

¶22

has not decided the case of the petitioner and it is pending for opinion of Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer in the next meeting.

¶23

In the light of the submissions made by the parties and particularly after going through Annexure-P/4 Serial No.2, there is no need of any interference by this Court at this juncture as this case is premature. Hence, this writ petition is disposed off as premature.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶25

Mkr./-

¶26

Chitranjan Kumar Madhup v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chitranjan Kumar Madhup v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daso Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anuj Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mundrika Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lalita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Uma Shankar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary