Writ petition by a wood-based furniture and saw mill firm against State forest authorities was withdrawn by counsel after arguments; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5685 of 2024
======================================================
M/S Rinku Furniture and Saw Mill, Natwar, P.S.- Natwar, District- Rohtas A proprietorship firm through its Power of Attorney holder Munna Prasad, aged about 49 years (Male), son of Bhrigunath Sah, Resident of village-Natwar Bazar, P.S.-Natwar, District- Rohtas (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Mistry, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Santosh Chandra Bhaskar, AC to GP 11 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-
U
M/S Rinku Furniture and Saw Mill
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest-cum-Chairman of State Level Committee for Wood-based Industries, Bihar
The Conservator of Forest, Wildlife, Patna Circle
The Licensing Officer-cum-Divisional Forest Officer, Rohtas Forest Division
The Ranger, Bikramganj
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
