Case brief
What is this about?
Patna High Court CWJC No.4711 of 2025 (decided 24-04-2025); petitioner Shital v. State of Bihar (Excise & Prohibition Dept.), Excise Commissioner, DM/SP/Superintendent of Excise/S.H.O. Gopalganj. Subject: release of seized Bajaj Pulsar motorcycle UP 57BP2846 seized under Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 488/2024, u/s 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 (dt. 14.11.2024). Keywords: Rule 12A Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules 2021; amended sub-Rule 2 (2022, 2023); no demand before competent authority; writ petition premature/not maintainable; Article 226 mandamus; confiscation proceedings finality; appeal to appropriate authority; speaking order within two weeks; prescribed form; Gopalganj; vehicle seizure release; advocates Md. Danish Quamar and Sumit Shekhar Pandey for petitioner; Additional Advocate General (4) for respondents.
What did the court decide?
No direct relief granted; writ petition stands disposed of as premature. Court directed that the petitioner remains free to invoke the Rule 12A remedy (application in prescribed form), failing which the competent authority must pass a speaking order within two weeks of receipt; appeal before the appropriate authority available if confiscation proceedings have attained finality.