Disposed¶7

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Mar 2025CWJC/4306/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anganwadi Sevika dismissal; CDPO Morva Samastipur; Memo No. 90 dated 15.03.2021; maintainability of writ petition; efficacious alternative remedy under guidelines; appeal before appellate authority; reasoned and speaking order; State of Bihar Social Welfare Department; Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Dharmpur Bande; CWJC No. 4306 of 2025; Patna High Court; Justice Harish Kumar; 21-03-2025; writ petition disposed off.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; petitioner advised to prefer appeal before the appellate authority, which is to consider and dispose of the appeal by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with the terms of the guidelines. ¶7

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4306 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sunita Devi Wife of Late Tilkeshwar Sahni, Resident of Village- Bishanpur Bande, P.O. Dharmpur Bande, P.S. Patori, Block- Morva, Distt- Samastipur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, New Secretariat, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

Director, Social Welfare Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

¶9

Social Welfare Officer, (C.D.P.O.), Morwa, Samastipur.

¶10

Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dharmpur Bande (Morva), Samastipur.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Caunsel (4) ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 21-03-2025 Heard the parties.

¶15

The petitioner is aggrieved with the order as contained in Memo No. 90 dated 15.03.2021 passed by the Child Development Project Officer, Morva, Samastipur whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service while working on the post of Anganwadi Sevika.

¶16

At the outset, learned Advocate for the State made a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition, in view of efficacious alternative remedy available under the guidelines.

¶17

At this juncture, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already preferred an application

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.4306 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2

¶19

but no action is being taken till date.

¶20

Suffice it to observe that the petitioner has remedy

¶21

of appeal before the appellate authority.

¶22

Petitioner is advised to prefer appeal before the appellate authority. In case, such an appeal is preferred, the same shall be considered by the appellate authority and dispose off by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with the terms of the guidelines.

¶23

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶24

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶25

shivank/-

¶26

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Sharma, Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Sharma @ Sharma Sanjay Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shamima Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Gopal Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Binita Shukla Vs The State of Bihar