Disposed¶26

Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2025CWJC/4161/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No.4161 of 2025; Preeti Devi v. State of Bihar; Dr. Anshuman, J.; decided 18-03-2025; Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission; Vikash Mitra Chayan Margdarshika Clause XII; alternative/before appropriate remedy; liberty to approach District Magistrate/Mission Director; writ petition disposed of without adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate/Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission (respondent No. 2) for redressal of her grievances under Clause XII of the Vikash Mitra Chayan Margdarshika. ¶26

Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4161 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari Wife of Dilip Ram A resident of Dharampura, P.S.- Dharampura, District- Saran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission, Fifth Floor, Bhumi Vikas Bank, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Director (Welfare), Saran.

¶9

¶10

The Collector/District Welfare Officer, Saran.

¶11

The Sub-Divisional Officer/Sub-Division Welfare Officer (Incharge Mahadalit), Chapra, Sadar.

¶12

The Block Development Officer/The Executive Officer, Manjhi, Saran.

¶13

¶14

The Incharge/The Block Welfare Officer, Manjhi, Saran.

¶15

Pradip Kumar Ram, Son of Ganesh Ram, A resident of Dharampura, P.S.Dharampura, District- Saran.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8 For respondent No.2 : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate ======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 18-03-2025

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for

¶21

the State and learned counsel for Bihar Mahadalit Vikash Mission are present.

¶22

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, according to Clause XII of the Vikash Mitra Chayan Margdarshika, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the District Magistrate/Mission Director, Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission (respondent No. 2) for redressal

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.4161 of 2025(2) dt.18-03-2025 2/2

¶24

of the petitioner's grievances.

¶25

Learned counsel for the State and Bihar Mahadalit Vikas Mission jointly submit that the appropriate remedy for the petitioner lies before the said authority, as provided under Clause XII of the Vikash Mitra Chayan Margdarshika.

¶26

As such, the writ petition stands disposed off, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority, in accordance with law.

¶27

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶28

Ashwini/-

¶29

Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Preeti Devi @ Priti Devi @ Priti Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ghanshyam Purvey Vs The State of Bihar

Sudha Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh @ Shashi Bhushan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rajni Kant Sinha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manohar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.