Court dismissed petition urging measurement of disputed land. Held that petitioner must approach appropriate forum via application under Rule 23 of Tenancy Rules, Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885.
Petitioner directed to avail remedy by filing application under Rule 23 of Tenancy Rules under Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2737 of 2025
======================================================
Doman yadav Son of Jamun Yadav Resident of Mednichaowk, Bansipur, Post-Amarpur, P.S.-Medanichouk (Surajpur), District-Lakhisarai (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Muztabaul Haque, (GP-12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
2 25-02-2025
Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned
Counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2737 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2
that the provision of measurement has been laid down under Rule 23 of the Tenancy Rules under the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 and under the said provision, petitioner has not filed his application.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's remedy for measuring and demarcating land lies before this Court or under State Tenancy Rules.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Doman Yadav
State of Bihar
District Magistrate, Munger
Circle Officer, Munger Sadar
Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
