Disposed¶22

Kedar Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

Patna HC11 Apr 2025CWJC/2411/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

mandamus; new electric/electrical connection application; deposit of requisite amount; Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited; South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd.; disposal on counsel's consent; consideration within four weeks; respondent no. 5; Patna High Court; CWJC 2411/2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 5 (Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Sub Division, Digha) to accept the petitioner's application for an electrical connection with the requisite amount and consider it in accordance with law within four weeks. ¶22

Kedar Kumar Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2411 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kedar Kumar Son of Sukhadeo Mahato Resident of Road No.3 House No.13, Indrapuri, P.O.-Keshari Nagar, P.S.-Patliputra, District-Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited through its Chief Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan Baily Road, Patna.

¶7

The Chief Managing Director South Bihar, Power Distributor Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶8

The General Manger Cum Chief Engineer Patna, Electric Supply Union, South Bihar State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Baily Road, Patna.

¶9

The Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, South Bihar State Power Distribution Company Ltd. Danapur, Patna.

¶10

The Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Sub Division, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. Digha, Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivek Prasad, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 11-04-2025 Heard the learned counsel for parties.

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed for the

¶16

following relief(s):

¶17

“That in this writ application, the petitioner above named prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities, particularly respondent no. 5 to accept the application of the petitioner for an electric connection and allow him to deposit the requisite amount for supply of an electrical connection to the premises of the petitioners situated at Mauza- Digha, Pargana and survey-

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2411 of 2025(2) dt.11-04-2025 2/2

¶19

Phulwarisharif at present, P.S.- Digha, S.R.O. + D.R.O. + District- Patna comprised in Thana No. 1, Tauzi No. 5174, Khata No. 974 Survey Plot No. 1474 and 1475.”

¶20

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has stated that the present writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No. 5 to accept the application made by the petitioner along with the requisite amounts and consider the same in accordance with law.

¶21

Having regard to the above made submission, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent No. 5 to accept the application of the petitioner for an electrical connection along with the requisite amount and consider the same strictly in accordance with law. The Respondent No. 5 is directed to consider the said application within a period of four weeks from the date of the copy of the receipt of this order.

¶22

With the above directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of to the extent indicated above.

¶23

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)

¶24

Ayush/-

¶25

Kedar Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kedar Kumar v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

M/s. Zainab Industries Vs The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (Biada)

Munna Kumar Vs The Branch Manager, Indian Bank

Vidya Bhushan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Sanjay Thakur @ Sanjay Kumar Thakur Vs The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited

Md. Sajid Hussain Vs The State of Bihar