Disposed¶22

Rajendra Nath Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jun 2025CWJC/20967/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna HC CWJC 20967/2021 (decided 16-06-2025, Purnendu Singh, J.) - writ petition seeking mandamus for payment of unpaid salary for 05.02.2013 to 09.03.2013 plus interest, against State of Bihar, Veer Kunwer Singh University, Ara (Registrar) and Principal Maharaja Collage, Ara; petition withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy; disposed of without ruling on merits; advocates: Satya Deo Kumar (petitioner), Madanjeet Kumar GP-20 (State), Nutan Sahay (University).

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the relief sought. ¶22

Rajendra Nath Sinha Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20967 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rajendra Nath Sinha Son of Ratneshwar Prasad Sinha, Resident of MohallaPakrichowk, Deli Medy Opposite Malti Hospital, P.S.- Nawada, DistrictBhojpur. At Presently residing at Pandit Jee Road, Sadar Hazaribagh, P.S.Hazaribagh Sadar, District- Hazaribagh, (Jharkhand).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Veer Kunwer Singh University through its Registrar, Ara.

¶8

The Registrar Veer Kunwer Singh University, Ara.

¶9

The Principal Maharaja Collage, Ara.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Deo Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar ( Gp20 ) For the University : Ms. Nutan Sahay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 16-06-2025

¶13

Heard Mr. Satya Deo Kumar, learned counsel

¶14

appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, learned GP 20 for the State and Ms. Nutan Sahay, learned counsel for the University.

¶15

Petitioner has inter alia prayed for following reliefs in the paragraphs No.1 of the writ petition:-

¶16

“That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ or writs or direction/directions to the respondents to pay the salary for the period of 05.02.2013 to 09.03.2013 to the petitioner with

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.20967 of 2021(4) dt.16-06-2025 2/2

¶18

appropriate interest which is unpaid till date.”

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner

¶20

seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the relief, as

¶21

sought for in the present writ petition.

¶22

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶23

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶24

Sanjay/-

¶25

Rajendra Nath Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Nath Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Shashi Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Shweta Mishra Vs The state of Bihar through Dr. B. Rajender

Niraj Kumar Vs The Union of India

Smt. Archana Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mahfoozur Rahman Vs The State of Bihar