itself vide letter dated 15th July, 1981 (Annexure-2). In fact the petitioner was married with the daughter of late Shambhu Sharan Thakur on 9th February, 1981 whereas the house in question was given to the petitioner on monthly rent basis by the Board on 27th November, 1980. On that date, the petitioner was not married with the daughter of Late Shambhu Sharan Thakur. In fact, the house in question allotted to the petitioner was not a special form, rather in regular course of business, the house was allotted to the petitioner and 17 other persons. And therefore, on perusal of the impugned order, it transpire that allotment of the house in question has been cancelled by the Board according to Clause 15 E of the Lease Deed and Clause 19 E of the Agreement. From bare perusal of the aforesaid clause, it transpire that petitioner has not concealed anything from the Board on the date of allotment of the house in question on a monthly lease i.e. 27th November, 1980 or on the date of registered agreement i.e. 26th August, 1981 or on the date of final execution of registered deed on 12th April, 2012. From perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the Board has not considered the reply to the show cause and the impugned order has been passed only on the ground that his late father-in-law was the Chairman of the Board, but it has not been mentioned in
