Dismissed¶¶29

Arun Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Feb 2025CWJC/2062/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.2062 of 2025; Arun Chaudhary; State of Bihar; N.T.P.C. Chausa Buxar; SJVN Company Pvt. Ltd. Chausa; writ petition dismissed; not properly drafted; relief sought not discernible; petitioner employment SJVN or NTPC unclear; liberty to file fresh writ petition with clear and concise averments; approach competent authority; no counsel appeared for petitioner; Prem Ranjan Kumar for respondents; Amaresh Kumar Sinha and Purushottam Kumar Singh for N.T.P.C.; Harish Kumar J; Patna High Court; 10-02-2025; oral order; dismissal at threshold.

What did the court decide?

The present writ petition is not properly drafted; the Court found it difficult even for the learned counsel for the respondents to get any instruction, and the petition therefore stands dismissed. ¶¶28

Arun Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2062 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arun Chaudhary, Son of Shayam Sundar Chaudhary, Residence of VillageSikrol, P.O.- Sikrol, Uncle- Chausa, District- Buxar (Bihar).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Sachiwalya, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Sachiwalya, Patna.

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Energy (Electricity) Department, Government of Bihar, Sachiwalya, Patna.

¶9

The Chairman, Electricity Department (BSEB), Vidyut Bhawan, Patna, Bihar.

¶10

The Chairman and Managing Director, N.T.P.C. Chausa, Buxar (Bihar).

¶11

The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.

¶12

The District Officer, Buxar.

¶13

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Division, Buxar.

¶14

The Manager, N.T.P.C. Chausa, Buxar.

¶15

The C.F.O. SJVN Company Pvt. Ltd. Chausa (Buxar).

¶16

The Supervisor, SJVN Company Pvt. Ltd. Chausa, (Buxar).

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

======================================================

¶19

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the N.T.P.C. : Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Purushottam Kumar Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 10-02-2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶22

Learned Advocate for the State and N.T.P.C. are

¶23

present.

¶24

After having gone through the contents of the writ

¶25

petition, this Court is not in a position to know for what relief has been sought for in the present writ petition and whether the

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.2062 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 2/2

¶27

petitioner was working under SJVN Company Pvt. Ltd., Chausa, Buxar or was an employee of N.T.P.C., Chausa, Buxar.

¶28

This Court finds that the present writ petition is not properly drafted and thus finding it difficult for the learned counsel for the respondents also to get any instruction, the same stands dismissed, however, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh writ petition with clear and concise averments and/or to approach before the competent authority, if so advised.

¶29

The writ petition stands dismissed.

¶30

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶31

supratim/-

¶32

Arun Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazmeen @ Naziya Begum Vs The State of Bihar

Nina Sinha @ Neena Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Nath Lal Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Singh Vs The Food Corporation of India

Rajani Kant Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar