Dismissed¶21

Dilip Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Feb 2025CWJC/2022/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2022 of 2025, decided 10-02-2025 by Purnendu Singh, J. Petitioner Dilip Kumar Das (counsel Saurabh Kumar, Deepak Kumar) against the State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Education Department; Director, Higher Education; and the Bihar State University Service Commission (Secretary and Chairman) (State counsel Ajay GA-5, Rakesh Kumar Ranjan AC to GA-5; BSUSC counsel Pawan Kumar, Utsav). Counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh; petition dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty. Disposal-only order: no merits adjudicated, no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh writ petition ¶21

Dilip Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2022 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dilip Kumar Das Son of Shaligram Harijan Resident of Village- Gorgama, Police Station- Amarpur, District- Banka.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Bihar State University Service Commission, through its Secretary, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Building, Budh Marg, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary, University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Building, Budh Marg, Patna.

¶10

The Chairman, University Service Commission, 8th Floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic Building, Budh Marg, Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay, GA-5 Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, AC to GA-5 For the B.S.U.S.C. : Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate Mr. Utsav, Advocate ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 10-02-2025 Heard Mr. Saurabh Kumar, learned counsel

¶15

appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Ajay, learned GA-5 along with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan, learned AC to GA-5 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned counsel along with Mr. Utsav, learned counsel for the Bihar State University Service Commission.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶17

petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with a

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2022 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 2/2

¶19

liberty to file fresh writ petition.

¶20

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed

¶21

as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶22

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶23

Niraj/-

¶24

Dilip Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Chandra Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Fulchand Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Subhendra Narayan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Prawir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Shakil Ahamad Khan Vs The State of Bihar