Writ petition seeking cancellation of a basket parcha issued in favour of the father of respondents 6 and 7 over land claimed as khatiyani land of the petitioner. No one appeared for the petitioner; the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19126 of 2018
======================================================
Jay Prakash Sah
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, AC to GP-18 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 13-10-2025
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, though Mr.
Vivekanand Singh, AC to GP-18 is present.
“(i) For issuance of writ/writs in the nature of mandamus to immediately Council the Bantest Parcha Which has been issued in the name of Arun Sah who is father of Respondent No.6 am 7.
(ii) For Commanding the Respondents as to why the Baskit Parcha has been issue though the lam in question is the Khatiyani land of the Petitioner.
(iii) For Commanding the Respondents as to why the baskit-Parcha has been issue against
Patna High Court CWJC No.19126 of 2018(3) dt.13-10-2025 2/2
the land of the petitioner.
Direction/Directions order/Orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper as the fact and circumstances of the Case.”
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U
Jay Prakash Sah
The State Of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
