Petitioner sought writ relief against education department respondents but counsel stated instructions not to press the application; the High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18942 of 2024
======================================================
Amit Ranjan S/o Prabhu Nath Gupta, Director of Jupiter Shakti Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. Address- Rajapur Mainpura, Kahar Toli, Phulwari, P.O.GPO, P.S.- Patliputra, District- Patna, 800001.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Meenakshee, Gp6 : Mr. Rana Veer Prawar, Ac to Gp6 : Mr. Harish Singh, Ac to Gp6 For the BEPC : Mr. Girijish Kumar, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
10 09-12-2025
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Shrivastava, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that he has instruction from his client not to press this writ application.
Accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed
Patna High Court CWJC No.18942 of 2024(10) dt.09-12-2025 2/2
as not pressed.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-
U
Amit Ranjan
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Additional Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director (Administration), Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director, Bihar Education Project Council, Patna
The Administrative Officer, Bihar Education Project Council, Patna
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
