Dismissed¶16

Dr. Kumari Punam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Feb 2025CWJC/18644/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.18644 of 2023, Patna High Court, decision 11-02-2025, coram Ashutosh Kumar ACJ (author) and Partha Sarthy J; NAFR. Upholds BSEB (Senior Secondary) Affiliation By-laws S.17(2) sub-cl.(Kha)(vii) barring relatives of School Managing Committee members from Headmaster/Principal posts as an anti-nepotism measure for aided schools; petitioner (daughter of the school's Donor, earlier appointed Headmaster but stepped down after Board reminder) argued the clause blocked her promotional prospects; petition dismissed; no inherent right to headship of a particular school; Court leaves open petitioner's personal right/merit and notes impediment lapses if no related member remains.

What did the court decide?

The only purpose served by the bar is that nepotism is not given any fillip in the School Managing Committee. ¶5

Dr. Kumari Punam Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the bar in Section 17(2) sub-clause (Kha)(vii) of the BSEB (Senior Secondary) Affiliation By-laws on appointing as Headmaster/Principal a person related to any member of the School Managing Committee is sustainable, pressed by a petitioner whose father headed the school as its Donor. +1 more

¶4

Court's answer

The only purpose served by the bar is that nepotism is not given any fillip in the School Managing Committee.

¶5

Ratio / Principle

The Managing Committee was constituted so that the school is run properly and powers and decision-making are not confined to a family, especially in a Government aided school.

¶9

Key takeaways

The concern of the petitioner is unfounded.ratio¶10
There is no inherent right of a person to be appointed a Headmaster or Principal of a particular school.ratio¶11
The Court finds no reason to modify, on any ground whatsoever, the constitution of the Management Committee under the By-laws.ratio¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (oral judgment per Acting Chief Justice Ashutosh Kumar, sitting with Justice Partha Sarthy) dismisses a writ petition challenging the requirement in Section 17(2) sub-clause (Kha)(vii) of the Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary) Affiliation By-laws that no Headmaster/Principal shall be appointed in a school who is related to any member of the School Managing Committee. The Court holds the bar exists solely so that nepotism is not given any fillip in the Managing Committee, and that the Committee's constitution ensures the school — especially a Government aided school — is run properly with powers and decision-making not limited to a family. It holds there is no inherent right to be appointed Headmaster/Principal of a particular school and declines to modify the Committee's constitution on any ground. The Court clarifies it has expressed no view on the petitioner's right or merit for such appointment, and notes that if no related member presently sits on the Committee the impediment would not bar her appointment should such a decision be taken.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18644 of 2023

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dr. Kumari Punam, D/o Shri Surya Narayan Singh Yadav, Resident of near Reliance Communication, Jagdeo Nagar, Danapur - Khagaul Road, P.S. - Rupaspur, District – Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), through its Secretary, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Patna.

¶10

The Director (Education), Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Patna.

¶11

The District Education Officer, Purnea.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhu Prasun, Advocate Ms. Renu Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/Board : Mr. Ankit Katriar, Advocate ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶15

and

¶16

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶17

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 11-02-2025

¶18

Heard Mr. Madhu Prasun, the learned

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.18644 of 2023 dt.11-02-2025 2/6

¶20

Advocate for the writ petitioner and Mr. Ankit Katriar, the learned counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary).

¶21

The challenge is to one of the requirements delineated in the Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary) Affiliation By-laws, which specifies that no Headmaster/Principal shall be appointed in a school who is related to any member of the School

¶22

Managing Committee.

¶23

Under the By-laws, referred to above, Section 17 deals with School Managing Committee, its constitution, powers and functions. Sub-Clause (2) of Section 17 provides that the School Managing Committee shall consist of certain number of members, which is differently prescribed for a recognized aided school and a private unaided school. The constitution of the Managing Committee requires different persons, namely, Head of the school; two parents of the students of the school; two teachers of the school and two other persons nominated,

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.18644 of 2023 dt.11-02-2025 3/6

¶25

to be the members.

¶26

While prescribing the minimum number of

¶27

members of the Managing Committee and the source from where they would be selected, sub-Clause (Kha)(vii) of Section 17 (2) further specifies that no Headmaster or Principal would be appointed in a school who is related to any member of the School Managing Committee.

¶28

The only purpose which it would serve is

¶29

that nepotism is not given any fillip in the School Managing Committee.

¶30

A Principal or the Headmaster of a school has many financial powers.

¶31

In the present case, the challenge has been mounted only on the ground that since the petitioner’s father was the Head of the school in his capacity as Donor of the school, the petitioner ought not to have been precluded from being appointed as the Principal of the school.

¶32

It has been pointed out that the petitioner

¶33

Patna High Court CWJC No.18644 of 2023 dt.11-02-2025 4/6

¶34

was appointed on the post of Headmaster of the school, but when the Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary) reminded the concerned school of the provision referred to above in the By-laws regarding the constitution of the Managing Committee and the proscription of any relative of any one of the members of the Management Committee of becoming the Headmaster of the school, she stepped down. The challenge is basically on the ground of this clause being an impediment in the promotional prospects of the petitioner, who would thus never get any opportunity to become Headmaster of the school.

¶35

The constitution of the Managing

¶36

Committee has been made for a purpose so that the school is run properly and the powers and decision making capacities are not limited to a family, especially when it is Government aided school.

¶37