The petitioner sought absorption in service but was denied relief. The court held that since the petitioner attained superannuation age during the case's pendency, the writ became infructuous and was dismissed.
Relief claimed for absorption in service was not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18388 of 2012
======================================================
Chandeshwar Mahto Son Of Late Mahath Mahto Resident Of Village P.O. Bahera Jahidpur, P.S.- Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv For the State : Mr. Prabhat Kumar, AC to GA-11 For Res. No. 8 : Mr. Subodh Kumar, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
5 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent-State and learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 8.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18388 of 2012(5) dt.07-11-2025 2/2
the petitioner for absorption in service cannot be granted. This writ has thus become infructuous and it is accordingly dismissed.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to absorption in service given his attainment of superannuation age during the pendency of the case.
Chandeshwar Mahto
The State Of Bihar
The Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government Of Bihar
The Director, Secretary Education, Government Of Bihar
The Regional Deputy Director Of Education, Muza
The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Sitamarhi
Alok Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
