Writ petition dismissed in default after the petitioner made no representation on the date fixed, despite a final indulgence previously granted for filing rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18055 of 2017
======================================================
Luxmi Construction and Electrical Works Son of Late Girdhari Singh, Resident of village- Pahlejpur, P.S.- Goria Kothi District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kinkar Kumar -Sc9 : Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Manaur Alam, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER
4 18-07-2025
1. On 11.07.2025, this Court has passed an oral order which reads as follows:-
“For filing rejoinder, at the request of the Learned counsel for the petitioner, as a last indulgence, list on 18.07.2025.”
2. Inspite of it, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
amitkr/- U
Luxmi Construction and Electrical Works
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Special Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah
The Nagar Parishad, Narkatiyaganj through its Executive Officer
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
