A writ petition concerning the Food and Consumer Protection Department was reported by counsel to have become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous without adjudicating any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16509 of 2018
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Kumar Labh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal-SC-4 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
as infructuous.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
vinita/- U
Anil Kumar
Biteshwar Singh
Binay Kumar
Pramod Kumar
Anita Devi
The State of Bihar
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
