Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after no one appeared for the petitioner on two consecutive dates despite a prior warning that non-appearance would lead to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15697 of 2016
======================================================
Tabassum Praween Wife of Md. Sahabuddin R/o Mohalla- Durgabari Near Masgid Gaya, District Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Chitranjan Sinha- PAAG2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
4 16-07-2025
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned
counsel for the State is present.
2. On the previous date i.e. on 27.06.2025, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ application. It was made clear that if on the next date also, no one would appear on behalf of the petitioner then the Court may consider dismissing the case for non-prosecution. Despite the order passed on 27.06.2025, again no one has appeared to press the writ application. It is thus clear the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the writ application.
3. Under these circumstances, the writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kiran/- U
Tabassum Praween
The State of Bihar
The Secretary, Health and State Family Welfare Department, Bihar Patna
Md. Sahabuddin
Alok Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
