Prabhat Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.C. Mishra-Sc16 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 10-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶17

counsel for the Respondent-State and learned counsel for the Respondent-University.

¶18

The petitioner in the present writ application has prayed for the grant of following reliefs:-

¶19

i) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents to treat the appointment of petitioner on the Class III Cadre as Routine/ clerk/Lower grade clerk since the date of his appointment which is 04-04-97 in terms of Memo No. 814 (R) dt 04-06-10 (Annexure-

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.15046 of 2017(4) dt.10-12-2025

¶21

2/5

¶22

9) issued under the authority of Registrar of the Jai Prakash University, Chapra (Here in after in short the University'). ii) Το direct the respondents university) to The felicitate the cadre of class-III Routine clerk /Lower Grade Since clerk) to the service of petitioner since the date of his appointment and accordingly grant the service benefit and monetary benefit in accordance with law at par with other similarly situated candidates.

¶23

iii) To direct the respondents to treat the case of the petitioner under the of Principle natural justice and principle of equality in terms of law emanating from Article 14 of constitution of India as also in terms of Article 16 and 309 of constitution of India. (iv) To hold and declare that respondents have discriminated with in his service cadre; which is bad in law generated from service jurisprudence. (v) To grant any other relief/reliefs to the petitioner for which he is entitled to have.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.15046 of 2017(4) dt.10-12-2025 3/5

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for claiming the above relief, the petitioner has submitted an application dated 20.12.2006 (Annexure-3) to the Registrar of the Respondent-University. Thereafter, the Principal of the college sent a forwarding letter in support of the grievance of the petitioner which was received on 21.12.2006 by the Office of the Registrar of the University. Thereafter, the Principal of the college sent reminder letters dated 29.01.2007, 14.03.2007 and 08.02.2008 to the Office of the Registrar of the University for consideration of promotion of the petitioner on the post of Class-III cadre. It is further submitted that through Letter No. 509 dated 28.08.2008, the Registrar of the University sought list from the Principals of the college situated under its jurisdiction regarding vacant post of Class-III and of candidates seeking promotion on Class-III posts appointed on compassionate ground. The Principal of the college vide Letter dated 01.09.2008 (Annexure-8) sent a list to the Registrar in which the name of the petitioner was indicated at Serial No. 1 with the details of qualifications. It is submitted that the name of the person indicated at Serial No. 2, i.e., Gopal Singh has already been granted promotion but the petitioner who was at Serial No. 1, has not been considered.

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.15046 of 2017(4) dt.10-12-2025 4/5

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that an appropriate direction be issued to the Registrar of the University to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to Class-III post by taking a final decision on his pending representation/application dated 20.12.2006 (Annexure3) within a fixed time after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶28

To the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the RespondentState and learned counsel for the Respondent-University do not have any objection.

¶29

Considering the limited nature of prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ application is disposed of directing the Registrar of the RespondentUniversity to take a final decision with regard to the petitioner on his application dated 20.12.2006 (Annexure-3) within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Needless to emphasize that the final order which shall be passed by the Registrar of the University should be a reasoned and speaking order.

¶30

With the aforesaid observation and directions, this

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.15046 of 2017(4) dt.10-12-2025 5/5

¶32

writ application is disposed of. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, will stand disposed of.

¶33

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶34

Gaurav Sinha/-

¶35

U

Prabhat Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhat Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Indukala Devi @ Indubala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prabhakar Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Geeta Kumari Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Dinesh Singh and Ors. Vs The Magadh University, Bodhgaya Through Its Registrar and Ors.

Arbind Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar