Sushma Kumari Vs The Union of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14550 of 2025

======================================================

Sushma Kumari W/o Shri Anand Mohan Rajak, Resident of Village and PostMohabatpur, P.S.-Sherghati, District-Gaya, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

The Union of India through DG Cum Secretary, Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi, Pin-110001.

¶5

The Chief Postmaster General, Bihar Circle, Patna, Pin-800001.

¶6

The Director of Postal Services, Government of India, Patna Circle-800001.

¶7

The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Gaya Division, Gaya, PIn823001.

¶8

The Sub-Divisional Inspector of Post Offices, Sherghati, Sub-Division, Gaya, Bihar, Pin-824211 .... ... Respondent/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Verma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohan Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.N. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jawed Gaffar Khan, CGC

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

¶14

3 18-11-2025 The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in OA No. 050/00497/2021, whereby and whereunder the learned Tribunal has refrained from interfering with the impugned orders dated 13.11.2020 and 18.11.2020 by which the petitioner has been put-off-duty.

¶15

At the outset, the learned Additional Solicitor General for the Union of India, Sri Krishnandan Singh, instructed by Sri Jawed Gaffar Khan submits that the departmental proceeding in question pending qua the petitioner herein shall be completed within a period of three months from today, failing

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.14550 of 2025(3) dt.18-11-2025 2/2

¶17

which the order of put-off-duty dated 13.11.2020 and 18.11.2020 shall stand annulled. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Rajiv Kumar Verma has got no objection to the said proposal put forth by the learned A.S.G.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and with the express agreement of the learned senior counsels for the parties, as aforesaid, we deem it fit and proper to direct that the departmental proceeding in question initiated against the petitioner herein shall be concluded by the disciplinary authority within a period of three months from today positively, failing which the aforesaid order dated 13.11.2020 and 18.11.2020 shall stand annulled and the petitioner shall be released from the order of put-off-duty as also would be permitted to join her duties. It is needless to state that the petitioner shall cooperate in the ongoing departmental proceeding and would not take any unnecessary adjournment without any reasonable cause.

¶19

Accordingly, the present writ petition stand disposed of on the aforesaid terms, with the express agreement of the parties.

¶20

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶21

(Soni Shrivastava, J)

¶22

devendra/- U

Sushma Kumari v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushma Kumari v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Vs The Union of India

Iftekhar Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Langra Vs the State of Bihar

The Union of India Vs Arvind Kumar Mishra

Pradeep Kumar Vs Union of India

Rajendra Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar