Dismissed¶26

Bipin Prasad Shahabadi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC2 Jul 2025CWJC/14298/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.14298 of 2016 Patna High Court dismissed for non-prosecution 02-07-2025; petitioner Bipin Prasad Shahabadi non-appearance; last indulgence order dated 25.06.2025; writ application not pursued; respondents include State of Bihar, SP Rohtas, SDO/Circle Officer/BDO Dehri-on-Sone, private respondents Paswan family of Gangawal/Dalmia Nagar, Rohtas; coram Alok Kumar Sinha; procedural disposal, no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

The writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution: after the final indulgence of 25.06.2025, no one again appeared for the petitioner, making it clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ application. ¶26

Bipin Prasad Shahabadi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14298 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bipin Prasad Shahabadi Son of late Ram Naresh Paswan Resident of village and PO Gangawali PS Dalmia nagar, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶8

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dehri-on-Sone Rohtas.

¶9

The Circle Officer Dehri-on-Sone Rohtas.

¶10

The Block Development Officer Dehri-on-Sone, Rohtas.

¶11

Hira Lal Paswan

¶12

Jawahar Prasad

¶13

Narsingha Prasad Respondent 6 to 8 sons of late Ramjee Prasad Resident of village and PO Gangawal PS Dalmia nagar, District Rohtas at Sasaram.

¶14

Ram Janam Paswan S/o late Ram Chandra Ram

¶15

Kumar Paswan Son of late Ram Narayan Paswan

¶16

Mohan Paswan Son of late Ram Narayan Paswan

¶17

Dhanjee Paswan Son of late Nand Keshwar Paswan Respondent No. 9 to 12 resident of Village and PO Gangawal PS Dalmia Nagar District Rohtas.

¶18

... ... Respondent/s

¶19

======================================================

¶20

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶21

4 02-07-2025 No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel

¶22

for the Respondent-State is present.

¶23

By order dated 25.06.2025, last indulgence was granted to the petitioner making it clear that if on the next date no one appears on behalf of the petitioner, then the Court may consider dismissing it for non prosecution.

¶24

Today again, no one has appeared on behalf of the

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.14298 of 2016(4) dt.02-07-2025 2/2

¶26

petitioner and therefore, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ application. Under these circumstances, the present writ application is dismissed for non prosecution.

¶27

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶28

perwez

¶29

Bipin Prasad Shahabadi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bipin Prasad Shahabadi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samsul Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chinta Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Yadav Alias Ram Pravesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Tabarak Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mishri Chaudhary Vs Madhusudan Kumar Sharvotam and Ors.