Dismissed¶23

M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited v. The Union of India

Patna HC29 Jan 2025CWJC/14037/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.14037 of 2024 (decided 29-01-2025): writ petition by M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited against Union of India/CBIC/Bihar State Tax authorities dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's own request to pursue settlement before competent authority; liberty reserved to seek alternative remedies in accordance with law; bench Rajeev Ranjan Prasad and Ramesh Chand Malviya JJ., order per Rajeev Ranjan Prasad J.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to seek any alternative remedy which may be available to it in accordance with law. ¶23

M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited Vs The Union of India — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14037 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited, a private limited company having its office at near State Bank of India, C/o- Muneshwar Prasad, Nai Sarai, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda- 803101, Bihar through its Director Kumar Mritunjay, (Male, aged about 56 Years), son of Late Tejnarayan Singh, Resident of Village- Moratalab, P.S.- Rahui, Moratalab, District- Nalanda, Bihar-803118.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union of India through the Secretary, Finance, North Block, New Delhi110001.

¶7

Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India having its office at North Block, New Delhi-110001.

¶8

State of Bihar through Commissioner of State Tax, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikas Bhawan, Patna.

¶9

Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Biharsharif, Patna East, Patna, Bihar.

¶10

Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Biharsharif, Patna East, Patna, Bihar

¶11

... ... Respondents

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. D.V. Pathy, Senior Advocate For the UoI : Mr. Anshuman Singh, Senior SC For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP-7 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-7

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and

¶16

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER

¶17

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

¶18

7 29-01-2025 At the outset, Mr. D.V. Pathy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits on instruction that he would withdraw this writ application in order to avail the alternative remedy of settlement before competent authority.

¶19

2. Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Union of India and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned AC to GP-7 for the State are present and have no objection to

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.14037 of 2024(7) dt.29-01-2025 2/2

¶21

the same.

¶22

3. Permission is granted.

¶23

4. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn

¶24

with liberty to the petitioner to seek any alternative remedy which may be available to it in accordance with law.

¶25

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶26

( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶27

lekhi/-

¶28

M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Kumar Mritunjay Construction Private Limited v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramnath Prasad Vs Principal Commissioner Of Cgst and Central Excise

Anguri Praveen Vs the State of Bihar

Vikram Kumar @ Brijlal Sahu Vs The State of Bihar

Ruhi Prween Vs the State of Bihar

Abhay Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Sharma Vs The State of Bihar