Veena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ application was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel as it had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12974 of 2017
======================================================
Veena Kumari D/o Basudeo Prasad Yadav, W/o Prabha Shankar Yadav,
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Umesh Narayan Dubey, A.C. to G.P.-27. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/-
U
Veena Kumari
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Secretary, Department of Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director, State Council of Educational Research, Training Bihar, Mahendru, Patna-6
Alok Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court