Disposed

Subhash Chandra @ Pintu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2025CWJC/1267/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought redressal of an unaddressed 2021 representation to the District Judge and Registrar, Civil Court, Darbhanga. The High Court disposed of the writ petition directing respondent no. 3 to consider the representation after giving proper opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 3 (Registrar, Civil Court, Darbhanga) to dispose of petitioner's representation with hearing within four months.

Subhash Chandra @ Pintu Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1267 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Subhash Chandra @ Pintu son of Ram Naresh Yadav, Resident of MohallahBakarganj Abhanda, P.O. and P.S.-Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga, Pin Code-846001 (Bihar).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Law, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Registrar, Civil Court, Darbhanga, Bihar.

¶9

¶10

The Accountant, Civil Court, Darbhanga, Bihar.

¶11

Amirika Devi, Daughter of Late Sitaram Yadav, Resident of House No. R299, Maksudabad Colony, Nazafgarh, Delhi, Pin Code-110043 (Bihar).

¶12

Mamta Devi, daughter of Late Sitaram Yadav, Resident of House No. R2-99, Maksudabad Colony, Nazafgarh, Delhi, Pin Code-110043 (Bihar).

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶16

8 03-04-2025

¶17

The matter is placed under the heading “For Order on Office Notes” with a defect that the notice could not be served upon the private respondent nos. 5 and 6.

¶18

Learned Advocate for the petitioner, however, submits that for redressal of the grievance, the petitioner has preferred a representation before the District Judge, Darbhanga as well as the Registrar of the Civil Court, Darbhanga long back in the year 2021, the copy of which is marked as Annexure-3 to the writ petition. Hence, the grievance of the petitioner is in

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.1267 of 2022(8) dt.03-04-2025 2/2

¶20

limited bound to the extent of disposal of the representation after giving proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned.

¶21

Learned Advocate for the State is present.

¶22

In view of the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the petitioner and taking note of the limited grievance, keeping the matter pending before this Court would serve no purpose. Accordingly, this Court thinks it apt and proper to dispose off the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose off the same after giving proper opportunity of hearing to all the concerned.

¶23

It is expected that the exercise aforenoted shall be completed preferably within a period of four months, from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶24

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶25

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶26

shivank/-

¶27

Subhash Chandra @ Pintu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Chandra @ Pintu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumari Karishma Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Mani Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mundrika Kumari @ Mundrika Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Sharma Vs The State of Bihar