Civil writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner twice failed to appear to press the application, following an earlier last-chance adjournment warning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 12250 of 2017
======================================================
Shailendra Kumar Srivastava
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : N O N E For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Jha- Gp27 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
9 01-12-2025
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present.
2 By order dated 07.11.025, this case was adjourned by way of last chance with a clear stipulation that if on the next date also no one appears on behalf of the petitioner for pressing the writ application, then the Court may consider dismissing it for non-prosecution. Today again, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.
3 In view of order dated 07.11.2025, this writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner again failed to appear despite a last-chance adjournment.
Shailendra Kumar Srivastava
The State Of Bihar
Alok Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
