A writ petition by a proprietorship firm against the Union of India, RBI and IndusInd Bank was withdrawn after the petitioner stated the grievance had been redressed; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12149 of 2024
======================================================
M/s Manokamna, a proprietorship firm through its Proprietor, Sanjay Kumar Modi, aged about 57 Years, Male, son of Om Prakash Modi, resident of Exhibition Road, Firdaus Building, L/m Pusp Vihar Apartment, DistrictPatna, Pin code- 800001, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Saurabh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Additional Solicitor General. For the RBI : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate. For the UoI : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and seeks permission to withdraw the present CWJC.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)
shakir/-
U
M/s Manokamna, a proprietorship firm through its Proprietor, Sanjay Kumar Modi
The Union of India through Secretary, Department of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises
Reserve Bank of India, Regional Office, Patna
IndusInd Bank through its Chairman
Branch Manager, IndusInd Bank, Kankarbagh Branch
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
