Akhilesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
CWJC No.11774 of 2025, Patna High Court, decided 05-08-2025 by Harish Kumar, J. Retired Moharirs (appointed 1987; superannuated 2010-2019) of the Survey and Consolidation Scheme sought pay revision and 1st/2nd/3rd ACP-MACP benefits (PB-2 Grade Pays 4200/4600/4800) at parity with Sanjay Kumar and other similarly situated employees (Memos 315/19.03.2021, 297/08.04.2020, 968/05.09.2022; Finance Department Memo 7788/02.12.2006; Finance Department opinion 20.08.2018; Resolution No.3A2WOPU-23/2006-7788 B(2); letter Memo No.233/2013-52 dated 13.01.2017). Writ petition disposed of with direction to the Director, Consolidation (respondent no. 4) to decide the Annexure-4 claim and accord identical benefits if found admissible, preferably within twelve weeks. Keywords: pay revision; ACP; MACP; parity; Moharir; UDC; Directorate of Consolidation; Annexure-4; twelve weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent no. 4 (Director, Consolidation) to take up the petitioners' claim raised in Annexure-4 series to the writ petition, bring it to a logical conclusion, and, if the claim finds favour and is identical to those with whom parity was sought, accord identical benefits, preferably within twelve weeks of receipt/production of a copy of the order.