Disposed¶31

Baby Rani @ Bebi Rani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jan 2025CWJC/11274/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.11274 of 2024, Patna High Court, decided 22-01-2025; new electricity connection denied despite application dated 28.08.2021 (request No. 52135557404); alleged theft by direct hooking to LT line; theft case under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003; assessment of Rs. 3,80,717/- under Section 126; direction to pay 50% and approach Special Court under Section 153 of Electricity Act, 2003 within four weeks; petition disposed of; Madhepura; NBPDCL.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with directions: petitioner to pay 50% of Rs. 3,80,717/- along with a new application and approach the Special Court under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003 within four weeks; any amount paid to remain subject to the Special Court's final decision. ¶31

Baby Rani @ Bebi Rani Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11274 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Baby Rani @ Bebi Rani W/o Bijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Vimal, Resident of Village - Piprahi, Ward No. 05, P.S. Gamhariya, District - Madhepura.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Energy Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited, through its Chairman cum Managing Director Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶8

The Chief Engineer Bihar State Power Distribution Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶9

¶10

The District Magistrate/Collector District - Madhepura.

¶11

The Electric Superintending Engineer, North Bihar State Power Distribution Company Limited Madhepura.

¶12

The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division Madhepura, District - Madhepura.

¶13

The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Singheshwar, District - Madhepura.

¶14

The Junior Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Singheshwar, District - Madhepura.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Adv. For NBPDCL : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Adv. : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Adv. : Mr. Sudarshan Bharadwaj, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhav Yadav, Government Pleader 23 : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP23 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶18

4 22-01-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

The present writ petition has been filed for the

¶20

following reliefs:-

¶21

“a. For issuance of an appropriate writ / writs / order / orders / direction / directions including a writ preferably in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing upon the respondent No. 4 to 8 to give new for which she is

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.11274 of 2024(4) dt.22-01-2025 2/3

¶23

entitle because she has applied for the connection through request No. 52135557404 whereas the respondents authority arbitrarly and malafidely did not provide the New connection in the small domestic house of the petitioner and electricity connection is fundamental right, it can not be over emphasized that electricity being a basic necessity Which is integral part of right to life as enshrined under Article 21 of the constitutional of India.

¶24

b. For grant of any relief or reliefs for which the petitioner may be deem entitle.”

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that

¶26

though the petitioner has made an application for new electricity connection, the authorities are denying the same. Learned counsel has made an application on 28.08.2021 but till date no electricity connection has been given to the petitioner.

¶27

In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents, it is specifically stated that the petitioner was indulged in theft of electricity by direct hooking to main LT line of respondentCorporation and that a case under Section 135 of Indian Electricity Act, 2003 has been filed against the petitioner. That the total value of the theft was Rs. 3,80,717/- under Section 126 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and in case the petitioner requires a fresh electricity connection then the above said amount has to be paid in full then the only the application of the petitioner will be considered. Further, it is stated that the final assessment has been made and served on the co-accused.

¶28

Having regard to the above mentioned facts and

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.11274 of 2024(4) dt.22-01-2025 3/3

¶30

circumstances, the petitioner is directed to pay 50% of the amount of Rs. 3,80,717/- along with the new application and approach the Special Court under Section 153 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Any amount paid shall be subject to the final decision of the Special Court. The petitioner shall approach the Special Court within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶31

With the above direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶32

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)

¶33

Ayush/-

¶34

Baby Rani @ Bebi Rani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baby Rani @ Bebi Rani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mumtaz Ahmad @ Syed Mumtaz Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Siddharth Suman Vs The State of Bihar

Aircon India Enterprises Vs The State of Bihar

Sarveshree Royal Enterprises Vs The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority

Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar