Dismissed¶30

Mahesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC23 Jun 2025CWJC/11141/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CWJC No. 11141 of 2017; Mahesh Sah v. State of Bihar; Executive Engineer, Bagmati Pramandal, Sitamarhi; Rehabilitation Officer, Bagmati Project; order dated 7.6.2017 (Annexure-3); rehabilitation Purcha dated 15.6.2017 (Annexure-4); respondents 2nd Party; land possession; withdrawal of petition; dismissed as withdrawn; Rajiv Roy, J; 23-06-2025; Swati Mishra; Dhurjati Kr. Prasad G.P.-14.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner's counsel. ¶30

Mahesh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11141 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mahesh Sah Son of Late Mithu Sah, Resident of Village- Joriyahi, Bel, P.S.Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar

¶6

Executive Engineer, Bagmati Pramandal, Sitamarhi.

¶7

Rehabilitation Officer, Bagmati Project, Sitamarhi.

¶8

Asharfi Sah, Son of Late Faguni Sah,

¶9

Mostt Rajwati Devi, Widow of Chandu Sah,

¶10

Babulal Sah, Son of Late Chandu Sah,

¶11

Nandlal Sah, Son of Late Chandu Sah,

¶12

Umesh Sah, Son of Late Chandu Sah, All resident of Village- Joriyahi Bel, P.S.- Bel, Distt- Sitamarhi.

¶13

Snita Devi, Daughter of Late Chandu Sah, Wife of Shambhu Sah, Resident of Vill- Jamua, P.S.- Bairgania, Distt- Sitamarhi.

¶14

Mahendra Sah, Son of Late Chhatu Sah, Resident of Village- Joriyahi, Bel, P.S.- Bel, District- Sitamarhi.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Swati Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr.Dhurjati Kr. Prasad, G.P.-14 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

3 23-06-2025 Heard the parties.

¶20

2.The present petition has been preferred for the

¶21

following relief/s:

¶22

(i) an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the order dated 7.6.2017 passed by the respondentExecutive Engineer as contained in Annexure-3 as well as the rehabilitation ‘Purcha’ dated

¶23

15.6.2017 issued in favour of

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.11141 of 2017(3) dt.23-06-2025

¶25

2/2

¶26

respondents 2nd Party as contained in Annexure-4, be issued;

¶27

(ii) an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents 2nd Party to forbear from effecting delivery of possession of the land in question to the respondents 2nd Party, be issued

¶28

(iii) an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents 2nd Party restraining them from interfering in any way with the petitioner's possession over the land mentioned in Annexures 3 and. 4, be issued.

¶29

Ms. Swati Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner in the presence of learned counsel for the State submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

¶30

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn.

¶32

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶33

Ravi/- U

Mahesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Mahto @ Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arbind Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Janardhan Prasad Singh Vs The National Highway Authority and Ors.

Kuldip Pandit and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Budhan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.