Disposed¶34

Dhananjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 May 2025CWJC/10676/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC 10676 of 2015; Patna High Court; Alok Kumar Sinha, J; order dated 08-05-2025; PHED water tank/jal minar on petitioner's raiyati land; khesra 1100, 3593, 3594; rakba 7.63 decimal; Amin, Ghoswari measurement report; Collector, Patna meeting 08.04.2025 pursuant to order dated 17.03.2025; Memo No.2029 dated 08.04.2025; liberty to file representation within four weeks; Collector to dispose within eight weeks by reasoned and speaking order; writ application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Collector, Patna within four weeks; the Collector, Patna to dispose of it within eight weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order after hearing the petitioner. ¶34

Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10676 of 2015

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dhananjay Kumar Son of - Shree Shiv kumar Prasad Resident of VillageChaksamya, P.o. Samyagarh, P.s Ghoshwari, District Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar and Ors

¶7

The Principal Secretary, P.H.E.D. Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Collector Patna.

¶9

The Executive engineer, P.H.E.D. Department , Govt of Bihar Patna.

¶10

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Patna.

¶11

The Block Development Officer Ghoshwari, District Patna.

¶12

The Circle Officer, Ghoshwari , District Patna.

¶13

The Circle Inspector, Ghoshwari, District Patna.

¶14

The Halka Karmachari, Ghoshwari, District Patna.

¶15

The Officer In-charge, Ghoshwari, district Patna.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vitesh Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Binita Singh, SC-28 Mr. Anil Kr Uapdhyay, AC to SC-28

¶20

======================================================

¶21

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶22

7 08-05-2025

¶23

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr Vitesh Kumar Singh and learned counsel for the respondent-State, Mr. Anil Kumar Upadhay.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although he had taken time on the last occasion to file a reply to the supplementary counter affidavit but there is no need for the same and hence, he is proceeding to argue the matter of merits.

¶25

In the light of the order dated 17.03.2025, the Collector, Patna, had conducted a meeting of 08.04.2025 and in the said meeting the following decision was taken:-

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.10676 of 2015(7) dt.08-05-2025 2/3

¶27

उकतकेआलोकमेअनुमंडलपदाधधकारी, बाढकोधनदेधशत धकयागयाधकप्रशनगतमामलेमेसथलीयजाँचोपरानतमापीकराना सुधनधशचतकरेगे।उकतमापीमेयधदवादीकीरैयतीभूधमपर जलमीनारकीचाहरदीवारीकाधनमारणपायाजाताहै, तोकोउसे कायरपालकअधभयंता, लोकसवासथयअधभयंत्रणधवभागकेमाधयम सेहटवानासुधनधशचतकरेगे।साथहीवादीदारारासतेकेसंदभरमे धदयेगयेआवेदनकेआलोकमेधनयमानुसारआवशयककाररवाई करेगे।परनतुउकतकाररवाईसी०डबलू०जे०सी०सं0-10676/2015 धनंजयकुमारबनामराजयएवंअनयमेमाननीयउचचनयायालय दारापाधरतआदेशकेअनुरपकीजायेगी।

¶28

सधनयवादबैठककीकायरवाहीसमापतकीगयी।

¶29

The aforesaid decision taken by the Collector, Patna, was communicated to all concerned including the petitioner vide Memo No.2029 dated 08.04.2025. On the same date, a report was submitted by the Amin, Ghoswari, wherein the following observation was made :-

¶30

पुनःश्रीमानकोसूधचतकरनाहैधकप्रशनगतखेसरा- 1100 केदधकणधदशामेअवधसथतसवरकुओंसेमापीप्रारमभ धकयातथा अनयखसराकाधमलानमापीकरतेहुएप्रशनगतखेसराका धसमांकनधकयातदोपरांतपायाधकपानीटंकीसैसरा 1100, 3593 एवं 3594 केअंशभागूपरबनाहुआहै।धजसकाकुलरकबा - 7.63 डी० होताहैधजसनजरी नकशामेसपषटरपसेदशारयागयाहै। इसधलए, आपकीजानकारीकेधलएऔरश्रीमानको समधपरत।

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.10676 of 2015(7) dt.08-05-2025 3/3

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in light of the decision of the Collector and also the observation of the Amin, which are in his favor, the petitioner be granted a liberty to file a representation before the Collector, Patna, so that the relief being claimed by him in the present application can be allowed by the Collector itself. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State has no objection.

¶33

As prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner and agreed by learned counsel for the respondent-State, the petitioner is granted liberty to file a detailed representation claiming relief on the basis of the above referred decision of the Collector and the observation of the Amin. If a representation to this effect is filed within a period of four weeks from today, after hearing the petitioner, the Collector, Patna, shall dispose of the same further within a period of eight weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order.

¶34

With the aforesaid liberty granted to the petitioner, the present writ application stands disposed of.

¶35

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶36

sharun/-

¶37

Dhananjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Lalita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Roushan Kumar @ Raushan Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Harihar Gond @ Harihar Sah Gond Vs The State of Bihar

Smt. Kamla Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.