Petitioner sought rent receipt for purchased land allegedly misrecorded as 'Anabad Surva Sadharan'. Court directed Circle Officer to decide the pending representation within 90 days without adjudicating merits.
Issue rent receipt and dispose of representation within 90 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1010 of 2025
======================================================
Vrinda Prasad Son of Late Ram Kumar Ram @ Late Ram Kumar Prasad Resident of Village-Konkee, Post Nad, P.S. Shivsagar, District-Rohtas, Sasaram).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
Counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1010 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2025 2/3
Patna High Court CWJC No.1010 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2025 3/3
Circle Officer, Shivsagar, Rohtas, to pass order on the petitioner’s representation within 90 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
off.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Circle Officer should be directed to dispose of the pending representation regarding the land title entry.
What direction should be issued to the respondent authority regarding the revisional survey records.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vrinda Prasad
State of Bihar through Principal Secretary
District Magistrate, Rohtas
Circle Officer, Shivsagar
DR ANSHUMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
