Disposed¶18

M/s D.V.M. Protech v. The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Home Department of Bihar

Patna HC4 Apr 2025CR. WJC/1063/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court consent disposal: criminal writ jurisdiction case disposed of in terms of amicable settlement between petitioner firm M/s D.V.M. Protech (proprietor Amit Mittal) and private respondent M/s Saha and Bright Polytech Pvt. Ltd.; settlement agreement dated 07-06-2024 executed at Delhi, terms annexed as Annexure 1/1 to I.A. No. 1 of 2024; joint application filed pursuant to Court order dated 28-03-2025; impugned order quashed; underlying PS Case No. 4029 of 2023, Patna Complaint Case; no statutes or precedents cited; oral order of Justice Bibek Chaudhuri dated 04-04-2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and connected applications disposed of in terms of the settlement (Annexure 1/1 of I.A. No. 1 of 2024); impugned order quashed in view of the settlement. ¶18

M/s D.V.M. Protech Vs The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Home Department of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1063 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4029 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

M/s D.V.M. Protech Through Its Proprietor, Amit Mittal

¶5

Amit Mittal Proprietor of M/s D.V.M. Protech, Office - Plot- No. 11, Ground floor, sector- 57, Industrial Estate, Kundli, Sonepat, District Haryana

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Home Department of Bihar Home Department of Bihar

¶9

M/s Saha and Bright Polytech Private Limited Through its authorized Representative, Shri Mikesh Shah S/o Sunil Prasad, Resident of Dadar Mandi,Guazarbagh, Near Vishwakarma Mandir, P.S.- Gulazarbagh DistrictPatna

¶10

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Shrivastav, Sr. Advocate Mr. Manu Tripurari, Advocate Mr. Apurv Harsh, Advocate Mr. Raghu Raj Pratap, Advocate Mr. Hritik Anand, Advocate Mr. Jaya Singh, Advocate Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Aag.13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 04-04-2025 The instant writ petition appears under the heading

¶12

“To Be Mentioned”.

¶13

It is submitted by the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that the dispute between the petitioners and the private respondent has been amicably settled and the terms of settlement has been brought on record by filing I.A. No. 01 of 2024. Subsequently, as per the direction made by this Court vide order dated 28^th March 2025, the parties have filed a joint

¶14

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1063 of 2024(4) dt.04-04-2025 2/2

¶15

application stating, inter alia, that during pendency of the instant writ petition, the parties, i.e., the petitioners and respondent no. 2 has amicably settled the dispute vide settlement agreement dated 07^th June 2024 executed at Delhi and the terms of settlement is annexed with I.A. No. 1 of 2024.

¶16

The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as the private respondent submits the instant writ petition be disposed of in terms of the settlement.

¶17

I have perused the terms of the settlement and the terms, being lawfully executed between the parties without any coercion, threat or undue influence, the same is accepted.

¶18

The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties (Annexure 1/1 of I. A. No. 1 of 2024) along with the writ petition, the connected applications are also disposed of.

¶19

In view of such settlement, the impugned order be

¶20

quashed.

¶21

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶22

Suraj Dubey/-

¶23

U T

M/s D.V.M. Protech v. The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Home Department of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s D.V.M. Protech v. The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Home Department of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Noor Zafar @ Noor Zaffar Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Bihari Singh Vs the State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Khagaria

Saurabh Suman Vs the State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Cooperative Dept., Bihar, Patna

Atul Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar through Its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar

Kirti Kumari @ Keerti Vs The State of Bihar

Anju Kumari Vs Subhash Kumar