Meera Devi@ Mira Devi Vs Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Prasad Yadav

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Praveen Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 23-07-2025

¶11

The petitioner has filed the instant application under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, against the opposite parties alleging , inter alia , that the O.P. No. 1 is his legally married husband. As the O.P. No. 1 refused and neglected to maintain the petitioner, she filed an application under Section 125 of the CrPC which was disposed of on 23^rd August 2006 in favour of the petitioner directing the O.P. No. 1 to pay maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 750/- per month. The opposite party did not make any payment to the petitioner. Way back in 2016, the petitioner filed Misc. Execution Case No. 15 of 2016, praying for execution of maintenance amount to the

¶12

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.333 of 2023 dt.23-07-2025 2/4

¶13

tune of Rs. 92,400/- with effect from 23^rd August 2006. On 21^st July 2017, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur passed an order in Misc. Execution Case No. 15 of 2016 (arising out of Misc. 31/2014) stating, inter alia that the petitioner is being maintained by his son who is an able bodied young man, capable to work and earn and therefore, no order is required to be passed on the application which was registered as Misc. Execution Case No. 15 of 2016. Against the said order passed on 21^st July 2017, the petitioner has filed the instant revision in the year 2023.

¶14

I have heard the learned Advocates for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The instant revision is hopelessly barred by limitation on the ground that the impugned order dated 21^st July 2017 is being challenged by the petitioner after a lapse of about 8 years. Secondly, proviso to sub-Section 3 of Section 125 of the CrPC states as under:

¶15

“(3) If any person so ordered fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order, any such Magistrate may, for every breach of the order, issue a warrant for levying the amount due in the manner provided for levying fines, and may sentence

¶16

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.333 of 2023 dt.23-07-2025 3/4

¶17

such person, for the whole or any part of each month’s 2 [allowance for the maintenance or the interim maintenance and expenses of proceeding, as the case may be,] remaining unpaid after the execution of the warrant, to imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month or until payment if sooner made:

¶18

Provided that no warrant shall be issued for the recovery of any amount due under this section unless application be made to the Court to levy such amount within a period of one year from the date on which it became due:

¶19

Provided further that if such person offers to maintain his wife on condition of her living with him, and she refuses to live with him, such Magistrate may consider any grounds of refusal stated by her, and may make an order under this section notwithstanding such offer, if he is satisfied that there is just ground for so

¶20

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.333 of 2023 dt.23-07-2025 4/4

¶21

doing.”

¶22

Thus, according to the proviso 1 to sub-Section 3 of Section 125 of the CrPC, the amount of maintenance due for the period of one year may be claimed in execution from the date of which it became due, therefore, the petition cannot claim execution of maintenance allowance from 2016 till date by way of filing an application for execution of the order which was passed in 2006.

¶23

For the reasons stated above, I do not find any merit in the instant revision and the same is accordingly dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to cost.

¶24

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶25

Suraj Dubey/-

¶26

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	25.07.2025
Transmission Date	25.07.2025

Meera Devi@ Mira Devi v. Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Prasad Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meera Devi@ Mira Devi v. Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Prasad Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Xxx (Priyanshu Kumar @ Murari Kumar) Vs The State of Bihar

Vivekanand Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Vs Puja Kumari

Digambar Thakur Vs Poonam Thakur

Reema Kumari @ Rima Devi Vs the State of Bihar