Disposed¶13

Ram Bilas Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jan 2025CR. REV./119/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Revision No.119 of 2023; decided 08-01-2025; Bibek Chaudhuri, J; Ram Bilas Prasad v. State of Bihar; Sections 82, 83 and 232 CrPC; warrant of proclamation and attachment; absconding accused Rajendra Dom; acquittal under Section 232 CrPC renders proclamation/attachment order infructuous; ST No. 340 of 1993; P.S. Case No. 9 of 1990, Kochas P.S., Rohtas; Rs. 5,000/- cost on SHO; revision disposed of as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Since the criminal case (Session Trial No. 340 of 1993) ended in acquittal of the accused under Section 232 of the CrPC, the impugned order dated 13.01.2023 does not have any force; accordingly, the criminal revision has become infructuous and is disposed of. ¶12

Ram Bilas Prasad Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.119 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-1990 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAM BILAS PRASAD Son of Gopal Prasad R/v- Algana, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad At present- Station House Officer, Kargahar P.S., DistrictRohtas

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 08-01-2025

¶9

The petitioner is a police officer in the year 2023, he was posted as Station House Officer, Kargahar Police Station in the District of Rohtas. Being aggrieved by an order dated 13^th January 2023 passed under Section 82 and 83 of the CrPC directing the petitioner to execute the warrant of proclamation and attachment issued against the accused Rajendra Dom and imposing him a cost of Rs. 5,000/- for non compliance of earlier order. The petitioner approached in revision before this Court.

¶10

At the time of hearing, it is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that Session Trial No. 340 of 1993 in which the impugned order was passed was disposed of by the Learned First Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sasaram Rohtas by judgment dated 22^nd May 2023, whereby acquitting

¶11

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.119 of 2023(4) dt.08-01-2025 2/2

¶12

the accused under Section 232 of the CrPC. It is also found from the copy of the said order that Rajendra Dom against whom the order of proclamation and attachment was issued subsequently surrendered before the Court to face trial. As the criminal case ended in acquittal, the impugned order does not have any force.

¶13

Accordingly, the instant criminal revision become infructuous and the same is disposed of.

¶14

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶15

Suraj Dubey/-

¶16

U T

Ram Bilas Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bilas Prasad v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nilam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Rambalak Ray @ Ram Balak Rai Vs the State of Bihar through the Dy. Secretary of the Dept of Mines, Patna

Prashant Kumar Gaurav Vs Madhubala Devi

Md. Afroz @ Afroz Alam @ Afroz @ Mohammad Afroz Vs The State of Bihar

Angita Devi @ Geeta Devi Vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

Nitish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar