The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition for non-prosecution on grounds of non-compliance with notices, absence of the petitioner at hearings, and pendency since 2018.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.1051 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
Sidharth Kumar Son of Indradev Mahto, Resident of Village- Jainagar, P.S. Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Smt. Reena Sinha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
10 05-12-2025
Petitioner was directed to file an affidavit regarding submission of Dasti notice, vide order dated 12.09.2025, but there is non-compliance of the said order.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
rakhi/- U
Sidharth Kumar
State Of Bihar
Binita Kumari
Sunil Dutta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
