Allowed¶23

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 May 2025CR. MISC./9721/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.9721 of 2025; Amas P.S. Case No. 225 of 2024; District Gaya; Sections 304(2) BNS 2023; snatching of bag containing Rs. 1.60 lakh by two unknown motorcycle riders; petitioner Rahul Kumar in custody since 30.09.2024; bail bonds Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each; learned J.M.-Ist Class, Sherghati, Gaya; condition to cooperate in trial; decided 14-05-2025 by Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-Ist Class, Sherghati, Gaya, subject to cooperation in the disposal of trial and availability as and when required by the court. ¶23

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9721 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2024 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul Kumar S/O Binay Prasad @ Binay Singh Resident Of VillageUpardih, P.S.- Gurua, District-Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 14-05-2025

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

¶15

as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 225 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(2) of the BNS, 2023.

¶17

As per the allegation, two unknown motorcycle riders snatched a bag containing cash of Rs. 1.60 lakh from the possession of the informant and fled away.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has been made an accused in this case merely because he has some criminal antecedents. The petitioner is under custody since

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9721 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 2/2

¶20

30.09.2024.

¶21

On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

¶22

opposed the prayer for bail.

¶23

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances,especially the period of incarceration, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-Ist Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 225 of 2024, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶24

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

Nirmal/- U T

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikandar Noniya @ Sikendra Noniya Vs The State of Bihar

Gulab Rain @ Md. Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Bimal Sah @ Chhotu Sah @ Bimal Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Chuni Mahto @ Chunni Mahato @ Chunni Lal Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Dashrath Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar