Allowed¶20

Kachalu Das @ Kayalu Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2025CR. MISC./9011/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 9011 of 2025, decided 19-02-2025 by Rudra Prakash Mishra, J. Bail application allowed in Abadpur PS Case No. 108 of 2024, District Katihar, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; 22 litres of country-made liquor alleged recovered from a bicycle; petitioner in custody since 16.10.2024; two criminal antecedents, on bail; plea of non-compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.; release on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Abadpur PS Case No. 108 of 2024. ¶20

Kachalu Das @ Kayalu Das Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9011 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- ABADPUR District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kachalu Das @ Kayalu Das Son of Khagendra Nath Das @ Khagendra Das Resident of village- Siwanandpur, PS- Abadpur, District- Katihar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 19-02-2025

¶10

Heard Mr. Bimal Kumar, learned counsel for the

¶11

petitioner and Ms. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Abadpur PS Case No. 108 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 22 litres of country made liquor was recovered from bicycle.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9011 of 2025(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/2

¶16

of liquor. It is submitted that seized bicycle does not belong

¶17

to the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 16.10.2024 and has got two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Abadpur PS Case No. 108 of 2024.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Raj Ranjan/- U T

Kachalu Das @ Kayalu Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kachalu Das @ Kayalu Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Manjhi @ Jitan Manjhi @ Anka @ Ankaj Vs The State of Bihar

Md Raus Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shivji Pandit @ Shivjee Pandit Vs The State of Bihar