Allowed

Suresh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Dec 2025CR. MISC./86664/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought regular bail in a complaint case under Sections 302, 120B and 34 IPC arising from an auto-driver's death. Allegations first appeared in a protest-cum-complaint after police filed a final form. The court granted bail on furnishing bonds with two sureties each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of JM 1st Class, Darbhanga.

Suresh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86664 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-814 Year-2021 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Suresh Yadav Son of Late Kailu Yadav Resident of Village- Ranwe Keoti, Ps- Keoti, Dist- Darbhanga

¶5

Rahul yadav @ Rahul Kumar Yadav Son of Suresh Yadav Resident of Village- Ranwe Keoti, Ps- Keoti, Dist- Darbhanga

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 22-12-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and State.

¶15

The petitioners seek bail in a case punishable for

¶16

the offence under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC.

¶17

As per F.I.R., on 04.08.2018, son of informant went

¶18

with his auto, but did not return and on next day, his dead-body was found near the road.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that initially, the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown and police, after investigation, submitted final form, but thereafter, the informant filed a protest-cum-complaint petition and for the first time, he alleged the involvement of these petitioners. He further submits that the allegations, levelled against these petitioners, are wholly false, fabricated & concocted and at best, afterthought filed with malafide intention. Petitioners have got clean antecedent and are in custody since 15.09.2025.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86664 of 2025(2) dt.22-12-2025 2/2

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

¶22

regular bail.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Darbhanga in connection with Complaint Case No. 814 of 2021.

¶24

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶25

anay

¶26

U T

Suresh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawahar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravindra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Barun Kumar @ Barun Kumar Rai @ Barun Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Gohan Bind @ Rohan Bind @ Gohan Mahto @ Nishad@Guhan Bind@Guhan Mahto@Nishad Vs The State of Bihar

Mangal Yadav @ Abhay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar