Allowed¶21

Dinesh kumar @ Dinesh Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Jan 2025CR. MISC./85965/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail allowed; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30(a) and 32(3); recovery of 96 litres illicit foreign liquor from Scorpio car; Madya Nisedh/Excise P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024, District Kishanganj; petitioner driver not owner, no criminal antecedent; custody since 15.09.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two like sureties; Patna High Court CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85965 of 2024, decided 09-01-2025.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted; petitioner to be enlarged on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Kishanganj, in connection with Madya Nisedh P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024. ¶21

Dinesh kumar @ Dinesh Das Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85965 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1081 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dinesh kumar @ Dinesh Das S/o Parmeshwari Das R/o vill - kumarkhand, P.O. and P.s. - Kumarkhand, District-Medhepura

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Samir Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 09-01-2025

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Madya Nisedh P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024 dated 15.09.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

3. As per the prosecution case, total 96 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Scorpio Car.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner is only the driver of the said vehicle and he has no

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85965 of 2024(2) dt.09-01-2025 2/2

¶18

concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2024.

¶19

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶20

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Kishanganj in connection with Madya Nisedh P.S. Case No. 1081 of 2024.

¶21

7. The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶23

Gautam/-

¶24

U T

Dinesh kumar @ Dinesh Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh kumar @ Dinesh Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deoraj Singh @ Dewa Singh @ Dewa @ Dev Singh @ Dewanand Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Paswan @ Mote Vs The State of Bihar

Saud Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Wasim Ahmad @ Amir Siddiqui Vs The State of Bihar

Kishan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar