Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kr. Sah Vs The State of Bihar

The State of Bihar 2. The Assistant Director, Mines and Geology Department, Banka Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 85560 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP For the Mines & Geo. Dept: Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate Ms. Kalpana, Advocate (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 86097 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP For the Mines & Geo. Dept: Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate Ms. Kalpana, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶21

3 24-01-2025

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85560 of 2024(3) dt.24-01-2025 2/4

¶23

The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case no. 535 of 2024 registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109(1), 132, 303(2), 317(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, section 27 of the Arms Act, sections 11, 41 and 56(2) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2019 and sections 4(i) and 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.

¶24

As per the prosecution case, six tractors loaded with illegally mined sand having been intercepted, the drivers of the vehicles managed to flee, however one of the drivers namely Gangesh Kumar was caught. A total of 14,100 cubic feet of illegally mined sand was seized. It is further stated that it was at this stage that 100-150 persons started pelting bricks and stones on the informant party and also resorted to firing from their pistols on the inquiry team.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. All the four petitioners, as per the F.I.R, were identified amongst the persons who resorted to pelting of stones and firing. It is submitted that

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85560 of 2024(3) dt.24-01-2025 3/4

¶27

the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case at the instance of their enemies. They are neither the owner of the vehicles nor do they have any concern with any of the seized tractors or trailers alleged to be carrying illegally mined sand. The cause of false implication of the petitioners is their antecedent. Co-accused Pramod Kumar Singh and two others have been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 26.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 79173 of 2024

¶28

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 submits that not only the petitioners are named in the F.I.R but there is direct allegation against them of having attacked the police personnel by resorted to pelting of stones and firing. The petitioners have antecedents of similar nature from before. In the instant case, a total of 14,100 cubic feet of illegally mined sand was seized causing loss of Rs. 15,23,125/- to the public exchequer. It is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel finally submits that Manish Kumar Singh @ Manish Kumar and Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kr. Sah are involved in several cases of similar nature.

¶29

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85560 of 2024(3) dt.24-01-2025 4/4

¶31

taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R, the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and grant of anticipatory bail to similarly situated co-accused vide aforesaid order dated 26.11.2024, it is directed that all the four petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case no. 535 of 2024 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.

¶32

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶33

Harsh/- U T

Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kr. Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Sah @ Chandan Kr. Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Aslam @ Kalakba @ Kalakwa Vs the State of Bihar

Bambam Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Shan Mohammad @ Shan Mo Vs The State of Bihar

Basuki Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Noorjahan Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Shravan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar