Allowed¶20

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Ray v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Jan 2025CR. MISC./85316/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.85316 of 2024; decided 18-01-2025; Chandra Prakash Singh, J.; Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Ray v. The State of Bihar; regular bail; Arms Act ss. 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35; country-made Katta; live cartridge; recovery; conscious possession; criminal antecedents; custody since 26.08.2024; Muffasil P.S. Case No. 518 of 2024; Saran at Chhapra; bail-bond Rs.20,000/- with two sureties; bail allowed.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail upon furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra. ¶20

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Ray Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85316 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Ray Son of Byas Ray Resident of Village - Bintoliya, Ward No. 13, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Saran at Chhapra

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rananjay Kumar Mr.Sumit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sharda Kumari. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-01-2025

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P for the State.

¶13

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 518 of 2024 dated 25.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 25(1-B) (a), 26, and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

3 . As per the prosecution case, one country made Katta and a live cartridge were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶15

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85316 of 2024(2) dt.18-01-2025 2/2

¶17

the said recovery. The petitioner has four criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 26.08.2024.

¶18

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶19

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 518 of 2024.

¶20

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶22

guddukr/-

¶23

U T

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Ray v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar @ Mithun Kumar Goswami @ Vikash Goswami Vs The State Of Bihar

Nilesh Sahu Vs The State Of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Bhagat @ Sushil Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Kush Kumar @ Om Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Chauhan @ Rocky Vs The State of Bihar

Bajrangi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar