Allowed

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 May 2025CR. MISC./8411/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in an FIR alleging armed assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and other offences during a land dispute between agnates. Noting the parties were related and injuries were simple in nature, the court granted anticipatory bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: release on arrest/surrender within four weeks on Rs.10,000 bonds each with two sureties, subject to S.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8411 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2024 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Son of Khelu Yadav Resident of Village - Konag, P.S. - Halsi, District - Lakhisarai

¶5

Ashok Yadav @ Ashok Kumar Son of Khelu Yadav Resident of Village - Konag, P.S. - Halsi, District - Lakhisarai

¶6

Khelu Yadav Son of Dhano Yadav Resident of Village - Konag, P.S. - Halsi, District - Lakhisarai

¶7

Rohit Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Son of Sulendar Yadav Resident of Village - Konag, P.S. - Halsi, District - Lakhisarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ahmad Ali

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 14-05-2025 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶17

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Halsi Police Station Case No. 187 of 2024, dated 17.06.2024, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 341/447/148/149/323/307/354-B/379/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 16.06.2024 at about 2 PM, while the informant was at her home, all the accused persons, including the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8411 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 2/3

¶20

petitioners, arrived there, variously armed, abused her, damaged the household articles and on the orders of petitioner Khelu Yadav, co-accused Sofendra Yadav and petitioners, Santosh Yadav and Rohit Yadav, tried to outrage her modesty. When the informant protested, the petitioner no. 1 Santosh Yadav assaulted her by means of iron khanti near her eyes and chest and the petitioner no. 4 assaulted her by iron rod over the head and hand of the informant.

¶21

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are agnates and there is previous land dispute between them. He further submits that the allegation against the petitioner no. 3 is general and omnibus in nature and the petitioner no. 2 has been described as order giver. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature.

¶22

Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the parties are agnates having land dispute and the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8411 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 3/3

¶24

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶25

Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Lakhisarai, in connection with Halsi Police Station Case No. 187 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶27

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶28

U √ T √

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamendar Kumar @ Kavindar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vikki Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Nayan @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satya Prakash Arya @ Shanti Prakash Arya @ Pappu Vs The State of Bihar

Mahmood Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Thakur @ Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar