Allowed

Deelip Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2025CR. MISC./81672/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to petitioners charged with an attempt on life. Considering non-specific allegations, clean antecedents, and custody duration, the court directed release upon furnishing a bond with conditions for presence and fines upon violation.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to specific conditions regarding presence and compliance.

Deelip Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81672 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-373 Year-2024 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deelip Prasad S/O late Ramjee Mahto R/O Vill.- Makanpur, P.S.- Noorsarai, Dist.- Nalanda

¶5

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar S/O Deelip Prasad R/O Vill.- Makanpur, P.S.- Noorsarai, Dist.- Nalanda

¶6

Raghubir Kumar S/O Deelip Prasad R/O Vill.- Makanpur, P.S.- Noorsarai, Dist.- Nalanda

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 373 of 2024 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 127(1), 127(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶16

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons is for making an attempt on the life of the brother of the informant with stone and knife. The occurrence took place in the background of relationship of the brother of the informant with daughter of the petitioner no. 1

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81672 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/3

¶18

who has since been married.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners and the informant is not an eye witness. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from person or possession of these petitioners. The entire case rests upon the uncorroborated statement of the informant. No genuine report for injury has been produced. Learned counsel further submits that, in fact, despite marriage of the daughter of petitioner No. 1, the brother of the informant continued to interfere in their marital life, which led to a dispute and under a conspiracy, the whole family of the petitioners have been made accused. Learned counsel further submits that the wife of the petitioner no. 1 has filed a complaint case resulting in FIR No. 239 of 2025 against the informant side under Sections 363, 366 of IPC and Sections 4 & 6 of the POCSO Act. The petitioners are having clean antecedent. The present case is counterblast. The petitioners are having clean antecedent and they are in custody since 22.08.2025. Charge-sheet has been submitted.

¶20

Learned APP for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioners.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81672 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 3/3

¶22

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the non-specific nature of allegation against the petitioners and further considering the period of custody of the petitioners and their clean antecedent along with submission of charge-sheet, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 373 of 2024, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the following conditions:

¶23

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶24

(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶25

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶26

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶27

Ashish/-

¶28

U T

Deelip Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deelip Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.K.Y. @ S.K.Y. @ S.K. @ S Vs The State of Bihar

Xxxx Vs The State of Bihar

Nafisa Tabassum Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Agarwal Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Sanjay Paswan @ Sukhu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Budhan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar