Regular bail application by an accused arrested in a robbery case under Section 394 IPC involving snatching of over Rs. 10 lakh from a bank customer service operator. The petitioner was named in co-accused confessional statements and said to have received Rs. 3,40,000/-. Bail was refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80906 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Pradeep Kumar Yadav Son of Birendra Yadav Village- Paliya Phulwariya, P.S.- Ramnagr, District- West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 11-02-2025 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80906 of 2024(2) dt.11-02-2025 2/2
statement in which the name of the petitioner cropped up. The petitioner is/was also a beneficiary of Rs. 3,40,000/- and another accused, Khusranjan Kumar has also given the name of the petitioner.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, not named in the FIR but named in co-accused confessional statements as a beneficiary of Rs. 3,40,000/-, should be granted regular bail in a dacoity/robbery case under Section
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradeep Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
