Bipeen Kumar @ Bipeen Rai Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Sangeeta Sharma, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 03-12-2025

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶13

petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection

¶15

with Beur P.S. Case No. 379 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, as amended uptodate.

¶16

Allegation is of recovery of 360 ml Indian Made Foreign liquor from a motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR01FN0973.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case due to highhandedness of the police. He has no concern either with the seized liquor or trade of liquor in any manner. The motorcycle belongs to the petitioner. As a matter of fact, the police had demanded illegal money from the petitioner

¶18

and on refusal, they roped the petitioner in a false case.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79705 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2

¶20

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District Court where the case is pending in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 379 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C / Section 482 (2) BNSS.

¶22

The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

¶23

The bail application stands disposed of.

¶24

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶25

mantreshwar/- U T

Bipeen Kumar @ Bipeen Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bipeen Kumar @ Bipeen Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyamsundar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sachin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Neelam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Majnu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar