Kamlesh Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Sonam Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-12-2025

¶12

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 19 litres of liquor from straw room of the house of the petitioner.

¶15

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which is outside the house. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own premises

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77961 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/3

¶17

for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that it appears that someone inimical to the petitioner planted meagre amount of liquor in order to implicate the petitioner. It is further submitted that he came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶20

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77961 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 3/3

¶22

seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of one case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Sumit/-

¶25

U T

Kamlesh Manjhi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlesh Manjhi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxman Sah @ Laxman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravish Kumar @ Rabish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sangeeta Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sangita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar