Allowed¶6

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Dec 2025CR. MISC./77905/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; CR. MISC. No.77905 of 2025; Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya; 03-12-2025; regular bail; Arms Act Sections 25(1-B)a and 26; Bihariganj P.S Case No. 283 of 2025; Madhepura; country-made pistol; two live cartridges; recovery; no independent witnesses to recovery; clean antecedent; judicial custody since 05.07.2025; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; SDJM Udakishunganj; bail allowed.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P.S Case No. 283 of 2025. ¶6

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77905 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-283 Year-2025 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjeet Kumar S/O Bideshshwari Mukhiya R/O Village - Bishanpur, Ward no.- 12, P.S- Biharigang, District- Madhepura

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Deepak Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Singh, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-12-2025

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Bihariganj P.S Case No. 283 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 of Arms Act.

¶16

As per allegation in the FIR, there is a recovery of one country made pistol including two live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that there is no independent witnesses to the alleged recovery. It is also submitted that

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77905 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2

¶19

petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.07.2025 having clean antecedent as mentioned in paragraph 3 of the bail petition.

¶20

However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶21

On perusal of the FIR, impugned order dated 29.07.2025, it appears that there is recovery of country made pistol along with two live cartridge, but petitioner possesses clean antecedent and there is no independent witnesses to the alleged recovery. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Bihariganj P.S Case No. 283 of 2025.

¶22

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶23

Sunnykr/-

¶24

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs Urmila Devi Chahani and Ors.

Yogendra Rai @ Yogendra Ray @ Yogi Rai Vs Vijaywant Kumar Choudhary

Krishna Kumar Sinha and Ors. Vs Gopal Paswan and Ors.

Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Prasad Vs Smt. Meera Devi

Premchandra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Paswan Vs The State of Bihar