Company Yadav @ Kampani Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2010 instituted for the offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 307 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

3. Prosecution case in short is that on 25-02-2010 in the evening the petitioner and other three co-accused persons came at the house of the informant taking weapons in their hands and started abusing without any cause. It is alleged that petitioner has assaulted upon the head of the informant.

¶14

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 16-12-2024. Petitioner

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7696 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2025 2/3

¶16

bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶17

5. The present one is the case of misuse of privilege of grant of bail by the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that appearance of the accused persons was on 20-07-2010 and case was committed on 15-12-2010, thereafter charge was framed on 20-07-2011 against the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that on 01-07-2013 bail bonds of the petitioner was cancelled due to non-appearance of the petitioner and thereafter, warrant of arrest was issued on 17-09-2023 and Sections 82 & 83 of the Cr.P.C. was also issued against the petitioner and the petitioner was arrested on 16-12-2024. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is ready to undertake any condition/s imposed by this Court.

¶18

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Belhar P.S.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7696 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2025 3/3

¶22

Case No. 36 of 2010, subject to the following conditions:

¶23

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

¶24

family of the petitioner.

¶25

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶27

Raj Kishore/- U T

Company Yadav @ Kampani Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Company Yadav @ Kampani Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harendra Mahto @ Harindra Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Altumas @ Jaid Ali@Alatamas Vs The State of Bihar

Samir Faruque Vs The State of Bihar

Sholu Kumar @ Solu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lalu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bindauli Ravidas @ Bindoli Ravidas @ Bedauli Das Vs The State of Bihar